Forbes
CMO Network #GettingBuzz
1/21/2017 @ 11:45AM
Avi Dan , CONTRIBUTOR
The collapse of Lehman Bros. in 2008 and the ensuing financial crisis is seared into the psyche of companies. It is known as the “Lehman Effect,” and it wrecked self-confidence and tolerance for risk-taking. It has manifested itself in the rise of Finance and Procurement and greater emphasis on efficiencies and cost cutting, often at the expense of marketing investment. Add to this the fact that CMOs are first on the firing line when companies miss their growth goals, and it becomes clear why taking a risk is, well, risky.
Agencies too are risk averse. In some respects, the holding companies that now dominate the communication ecosystem shifted the emphasis on Madison Avenue from inspired virtuosity to financial predictability. Their entire approach is to mitigate risk, even at the cost of blunting creativity.
However, it’s time to consider renewed tolerance for unpredictability. Avoiding risk is not a sustainable strategy because it’s impossible to deliver top-line growth with cuts alone. It’s time to change the risk/reward ratio in a meaningful way by applying a responsible, disciplined risk strategy at the center of the enterprise:
1. Establish a 70/20/10 approach: 70% of the budget is the bread-and-butter marketing activities – undertakings that don’t not require excessive risk-taking. This is the stuff that pays the bills. The next 20% should be applied to quasi-radical innovations, essentially gradual, evolutionary ideas, improving on the 70% bucket, ideas new to the brand or service.The last 10% of the budget should go to experiment with high-risk, high-reward undertakings. It’s the extreme ideas totally new to the marketplace – new ways to inspire the audience that could become tomorrow’s 20% or 70% bucket. It’s the portion of the budget that’s meant to see into the future and, when done right, can pay big dividends by setting you up as a thought leader in your market.
2. Hire the right people: Risk and innovation depend on people almost more than any other activity of the enterprise. Companies should rededicate themselves to hiring people who intuitively understand the discipline of innovation and risk taking. Innovators are inquisitive, passionate, and self-starting. They multi-task and often experiment with multiple approaches. If innovation is the ability to recognize opportunity, then the essence of being an innovator is being able to mobilize talent and resources quickly enough to seize that opportunity and turn it into a business idea.
3. Create a culture of risk: Don’t create an elaborate centralized bureaucracy that would stifle creative energy. A flat, open organization designed around fast decision-making, is more suitable to risk taking and innovation regardless of the reporting hierarchy. Proposals should move quickly through the approval process. Most risk takers are worried that the window of opportunity is closing while their sponsors are still making up their minds, and that sort of thinking will dissipate their creativity. Particularly for big companies, the challenge is to find ways to nourish the activities that give rise to innovation, while at the same time cultivating the ability to move decisively once an opportunity presents itself.
4. Compensation: A critical aspect of being innovative is the ability to negotiate the tension between risk taking and discipline. Innovation is a risky business, and failure is commonplace. Rewarding success is easy, rewarding intelligent failure is more important. People should not be evaluated strictly by results but rather by the quality of their efforts. You’d want people to feel secure enough taking intelligent risks without also jeopardizing their compensation or their careers.
5. Data: Risk and data are not the opposite of each other, they are the two sides of the same coin. This is where many companies falter with marketing, and it’s because they don’t rely on data to perform the necessary analysis and analytical work to measure past ideas. Setting goals with specific benchmarks and iterating based on results from the past is the best way to mitigate risk and differentiate yourself from the competition.
Avi Dan is CEO of Avidan Strategies.
———————————-